Forecasts, forecasts…where do they end for mHealth?

We’ve been keeping a running narrative of various market projections in telehealth, eHealth and mHealth–the most recent being Juniper Research’s 2014 mobile healthcare global estimate of $1.9 billion–but if you haven’t seen and bookmarked Brian Dolan’s bar graph comparison at Mobihealthnews, you should. … Read moreForecasts, forecasts…where do they end for mHealth?

Pendant alarms: users don't use them (UK report)

A paper presented at the 2010 Second International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, St. Maarten, Netherlands Antilles in February confirms what has long been suspected: people with pendant alarms (medical alerts/PERS) wear them less often than would be optimal for their safety. Researchers Andrea Taylor and Stefan Agamanolis of Distance Lab, in Evaluation of the User Experience of a Standard Telecare Product – The Personal Trigger (etelemed, pp.51-56) surveyed over 1,300 clients who were using the leading UK manufacturer’s ‘Personal Trigger’, as they prefer to call the pendant alarm, in North East Scotland. They had a 60% response rate and the abstract tells us that…

Nowhere to hide when FDA and HIT collide

It paraphrases a 1950s sci-fi movie ad campaign, but it’s not fantasy.  Expect that FDA will be regulating hospital and other caregiver mHealth (and by implication, all the ‘teles’, eHealth and the FCC’s favored term ‘eCare’) if they stray beyond the practice of medicine into developing, modifying or selling HIT that starts to resemble what FDA classifies as ‘devices.’  Brad Thompson presents his legal point of view in his latest article over at Mobihealthnews(Our 25 February article on FDA and EMRs, with link to previous Thompson article here)

[Editor’s update 22 April.]  Brad Thompson’s summary of his eight-article series, plus a preview of the eighth and final article, follows.  It is reprinted here from his posting on LinkedIn with his permission: